DisplayLink Forum - View Single Post - performance differences between DL-165 vs DL-195

unixguy · 08-08-2011, 02:26 PM

Are there any performance differences between the DL-165 vs DL-195 if they are both running at 1600x900? I have a realtime application that needs to be able to do remote control logins(using gotomypc or teamviewer) and my current core i3 notebook(Lenovo thinkpad edge notebook with HD3000 intel graphics,windows XP) can not drive an external monitor fast enough when using gotomypc or teamviewer to keep up with displaying realtime signals. I have tried a EVGA UV16+(DL-165) and it improves the realtime display performance on the external monitor as compared to driving the external monitor using the internal HD 3000 Intel graphics. Will I get better performance using DL-195 based USB product?

08-08-2011, 02:26 PM	#1
unixguy Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 1	performance differences between DL-165 vs DL-195 Are there any performance differences between the DL-165 vs DL-195 if they are both running at 1600x900? I have a realtime application that needs to be able to do remote control logins(using gotomypc or teamviewer) and my current core i3 notebook(Lenovo thinkpad edge notebook with HD3000 intel graphics,windows XP) can not drive an external monitor fast enough when using gotomypc or teamviewer to keep up with displaying realtime signals. I have tried a EVGA UV16+(DL-165) and it improves the realtime display performance on the external monitor as compared to driving the external monitor using the internal HD 3000 Intel graphics. Will I get better performance using DL-195 based USB product?